In the article “I Was
Just Doing a Little Joke There”: Irony and the Paradoxes of the Sitcom in The Office, Eric Detweiler discusses the
different forms of irony in The Office. He also compares The Office to a few different television shows such as Arrested Development and Seinfeld. Whether you’ve seen an episode of The Office or not, everyone has most
likely been exposed to the type of irony used in The Office.
“The premise of The
Office is this: a television crew is making a documentary about the typical
American workplace, recording the everyday events that transpire at the
Scranton, Pennsylvania branch of the Dunder Mifflin Paper Company” (Detweiler,
2012). Detweiler describes a few of the
cast members from the show and gives examples of the use of irony through these
characters.
One character Detweiler describes is Jim Halpert, “an
affable prankster in his upper twenties, is a Dunder Mifflin salesman and the
ironic center of the show” (Detweiler, 2012).
In most of the episodes of The
Office, Jim constantly makes eye contact with the camera, sometimes shaking
his head or raising an eyebrow, in order to spell out the ironic situation to
the audience. “As Jim is purportedly in
a documentary, he is aware of the camera.
Given that he is often the only Dunder Mifflin employee aware of the
ridiculousness of his coworkers’ actions, he seeks to extend the in-joke beyond
himself through a commiserating glance” (Detweiler, 2012).
Another character Detweiler describes is Pam Beesley, the
secretary at Dunder Mifflin and Jim’s confidante. Pam has the typical “woman’s job” on The Office and is constantly being told
to take notes at meetings and staff gatherings (Detweiler, 2012). “’Female characters are shooed or shamed away from writing for academic or
other public purposes’ (38). This also
holds true in the case of The Office,
but only in a certain way. Pam, as a
secretary and receptionist, is employed in a job historically marked as female
in both sitcoms and the ‘gender-segregated workplace’”(Detweiler, 2012). Although people view Pam as just a secretary,
she also has an important role in the show as Jim’s accomplice. “Key to their relationship is the fact that
Pam can keep up with Jim’s irony, detachment, and sarcasm. Jim provides opportunities for Pam to use
literacy ironically” (Detweiler, 2012).
Another character from the show that Detweiler describes
is Michael Scott, the office’s boss.
Michael tries hard to be well-liked by all of his employees, and
sometimes goes too far with his jokes without realizing he does. Most of these inappropriate jokes are made
during staff meetings, and responses from Jim and Pam are always seen; Jim will
usually look at the camera, shocked and open-mouthed, and the audience feels
that they are part of the joke and understand Michael’s mistake. While his irony is usually not intentional,
Michael is a very ironic character in The
Office. “Michael, in contrast to
Jim, is often unintentionally rendered ironic by his situation. When, for instance, he hits an employee with
his car right after stating, ‘This is going to be a very good year,’ the irony
of the situation is beyond his control”(Detweiler, 2012).
While so much irony is unlikely to happen to someone, The Office lets the audience sit back
and enjoy a laugh at this ridiculous amount of irony. I’m sure we all have a boss or co-worker that
may act the same way and this show takes everyday office activities to the
extreme to make us laugh. “It ridicules
the everyday, but does not drive the viewer to turn off the television (or the
salesman to quit his job with the paper company)” (Detweiler, 2012). I believe this article does a good job of describing
the show. I’ve seen a few episodes of The Office and have laughed so hard that
I’ll get funny looks from my family.
While it deals with everyday situations, it makes you realize how ridiculous
some things can be. I liked how Detweiler
describes each character; all of the main characters are an important part of
the show and I don’t think that the show would be the same if one of them weren’t
there.
References
Detweiler,
E. (2012). “i was just doing a little joke there”: Irony and the paradoxes of
the sitcom in the office. The journal of popular culture, 45(4), 727-748.
Retrieved from http://olinkserver.franklin.edu/search~S0?/tjournal
of popular culture/tjournal of popular
culture/1,1,3,B/l856~b1119754&FF=tjournal of popular culture&1,,3,1,0.
Nice job on this Maya,
ReplyDeleteI watch this show from time to time and your absolutely correct about all the irony. They did a great job of putting the right mix of characters into this show. The funny thing is, is that we have sort of the same group at the office I work at. It may not be this extent but we have the boss that is always trying too hard to be funny. We have the outcast that talks to no one. We have the suck-up that will do anything for the boss and idealizes him. We also have the constant love triangle between coworkers and everyone trying to find out who is dating who. Its Crazy. Wait, maybe our office is more like a soap opera. haha
Your analysis is well written and interesting because it is my favorite show. You described the irony of the characters personality in a way I did not notice before. As a fan of show, your description of Jim being the center of the show, but the other characters being just as important kept me watching. I became a fan when I saw the movie version, the irony, and sarcasm, and diversity of personality in the office are characters that I identified with professionally. This is the shows last season so I going to miss ridiculing the daily activities of the office. They made the office politics and mishaps bearable after seeing them in a light hearted way.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed your analysis, even though I have never seen this show, but I have seen all of the Seinfeld shows. I can identify with that attitude it was the same way in the automobile sale business.
ReplyDeleteI am going to hulu to watch a few reruns of this show.
Thank you,
Micheal Talley
I enjoyed reading your summary of the show the Office. Do you think that main intention of this show is for comedic purposes or to highlight things like gender roles and stereotypes in the office setting? What do you think the author of the journal article is trying to say about the show? Thanks,
ReplyDelete